Both archipelagos are surrounded by ocean, boast volcanic landscapes, and are lushly green. The only difference is that Hawaii is located in the Pacific Ocean, while the Azores are located "next to" Portugal in the Atlantic Ocean. In the Azores, look forward to an active journey through rugged nature, abundant diversity, breathtaking views, and less tourism than Hawaii.

Hawaii 22 hours of flying and 3000 kilos of CO2 eq
vs.
Azores 4 hours flight and 800 kilos of CO2 eq

No, not based on air miles, but certainly on impact, Lombok is a more sustainable choice than Bali. Actually, we should say "more impactful" instead of "more sustainable." There's still a lot of poverty on Lombok, and you can support the local population by going there. Bali has actually been somewhat crushed by tourism. Lombok is learning from that lesson and is now also investing heavily in ecotourism. Moreover, Lombok is less developed with large hotels, and the nature is still very pristine and less crowded. We don't want everyone to go to Lombok at once, but a few more people would be welcome.

Bali 3100 kilo CO2-eq for the flight
vs.
Lombok 3100 kilo CO2-eq for the flight

Nothing compares to the cultures of other continents. The people and customs of Peru, Argentina, and Brazil are unique to experience. But if you're looking for a good hike, diverse landscapes, and a backpacker vibe, check out the Canary Island of La Gomera. You fly into Tenerife and from there take the ferry to this hilly, green island. The banana plantations, colorful villages, and many hiking trails and even a subtropical rainforest will definitely remind you of South America. Compared to the other Canary Islands, La Gomera is quieter in terms of tourism and attracts many adventurous travelers.

Paraguay 2700 kilo CO2-eq for the flight
vs.
Madeira 900 kilo CO2-eq for the flight